Tag Archives: technology

Creepy “Girls Around Me” app

One of our most popular and engaging workshops through MAC is the one about how technologies are exploited to stalk and harass people. Audiences are often unnerved by how software and hardware is used to gather information that is then used to monitor, locate, harass, impersonate, or intimidate them.

A recent article by John Brownlee at Cult of Mac explores a similarly creepy app called Girls Around Me. At the time of this post, the app had been pulled from the iOS app store, but it doesn’t mean it or something like it won’t come back. The app highlights security and privacy concerns inherent in some of the ways that personal information is disclosed through apps and social networking.

On the surface, the app is sleazy and creepy looking. It is designed with silhouettes of naked women on a radar screen, as if they are targets. It evens advertises that you should consider this public information an invitation to approach these women for sex or worse. “In the mood for love, or just after a one-night stand? Girls Around Me puts you in control.” The app plots public information from profiles on Facebook and Foursquare on a map so that you can see who has checked in near your current location. It also allows you to browse the profiles, check pictures, and message the individual. The design of the app and the stated purpose, again, is creepy unless you are the person “in control.”

However, Brownlee correctly highlights the fact that the app is accessing data that is considered public, whether or not the user understands the privacy settings or how the information is being used.  The best part about the app is it is another example of why we should educate people about how their data is used so that they can make purposeful decisions about what they share. If anything, this is a creepy enough example to get people to pay attention. 

At the end of every technology and stalking workshop, there is a line of people who want assistance in putting a numeric or visual password on their mobile device(s). Hopefully, we can use examples like this to educate people about how their information is distributed and accessed, as well as ways in which they can take steps to remain safe.


January is stalking awareness month

Check out this great stalking awareness campaign called Stalking: Know It. Name It. Stop It. Not only do they have promotional materials to raise awareness about stalking, there are also numerous resources related to safety planning, outreach materials, and information specific to responders like law enforcement and prosecutors.

Last year, the Men’s Anti-Violence Council developed a workshop about commonly exploited technology used to stalk and harass individuals. It has been extremely popular and we have presented it at numerous conferences and workshops. We’ll be presenting it next month at The Big Ten Counseling Center conference regarding how this topic relates to counseling centers and college students. Stay tuned for when we upload the Power Point from that presentation.


Federal judge ruled that “You have a constitutional right to stalk and harass people on Twitter.”

From 2008 to 2010, William Cassidy harassed Alyce Zeoli through Twitter sending her over 8,000 tweets. He criticized her looks, made fun of her religion, described graphic ways in which she could die, and repeatedly told her to commit suicide. Zeoli blocked his accounts but Cassidy just created another one. In 2010, Zeoli reported the harassment and the FBI pressed charges against Cassidy for stalking Zeoli and  causing her “substantial emotional distress.”

However, this week federal judge Roger W. Titus, dismissed the case stating, “while Mr. Cassidy’s speech may have inflicted substantial emotional distress, the government’s indictment here is directed squarely at protected speech: anonymous, uncomfortable Internet speech addressing religious matters.” Apparently Judge Titus doesn’t really understand what  Twitter is. He compared it to a colonial bulletin board where if you didn’t like something, you don’t read it. News flash Judge Titus, Twitter is no different from a text message, email, or phone call. It is direct contact through electronic means with another individual. Just telling someone to “ignore it, turn it off, or don’t look it” is about as good as telling a stalking victim to just block the phone number, quit their job, or simply ignore the animal head left in a box on the front porch. The message this sends to victims is ridiculously callous, “If you don’t like it, too bad, just ignore it.”

However, there was some protection from harassment and stalking enforced this week. A judge in Minnesota ordered a man to take down his “revenge” blog about his ex-girlfriend because individuals have a “right to be free from harassment”and instated a 50 year restraining order! But wait, isn’t a blog is like a colonial bulletin board? No, no it’s not.

Anyone in a position of enforcing or creating rules/laws/policies about harassment, stalking, bullying, or any other inappropriate conduct through electronic/Internet/technological means should have a basic understanding of what the Internet is and how social media services on it function. People should be protected from those who intimidate, threaten, harass, monitor, record, impersonate, and stalk them regardless of the method.


Apps Against Abuse winners announced!

The Office of the Vice President and the White House Office of Science and Technology just announced the winners of the Apps Against Abuse challenge. The two apps are called Circle of 6 and On Watch. The Circle of 6 app was created by by our very own friend of MAC, Nancy Schwartzman over at The Line!

The Circle of 6 app lets you designate six individuals to be in your “circle.” Once you have selected your six allies, you can select different ways to ask for their support. If you tap the car icon, a text message to come and get you along with your GPS location is sent. Tapping the phone icon sends a message to call the sender to interrupt the current situation. The chat icon connects the sender with their circle so that they can get advice about a situation. A danger button automatically calls a national safety hotline. Once it is set up, it would take a user two taps in the app to get help. Take a look at some of the screen shots below. This looks like a great way to stay connected and get help in a dangerous or potentially dangerous situation.

The app is a prototype and is set to be released on the app markets across a variety of operating systems in January, 2012. You can support and stay updated about the app on their Facebook page.


Apps against Abuse

Do you have software development skills and a passion for anti-violence initiatives? If so, we have found the perfect challenge for you!

Yesterday, Vice President Joe Biden, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius launched a technology challenge called the “Apps Against Abuse.” It is a national competition to develop new apps to help prevent sexual assault and dating violence. You can view the full press release here.

Click here to register. Registration is free. Submissions are already being accepted and the deadline is October 17, 2011. Winners will be announced at the end of October.


Cell phone technology aimed at improving campus safety

The Men’s Anti-Violence Council members have presented numerous workshops about technology and safety. We’ve mainly focused on the ways in which software and hardware can be used to stalk and monitor individuals. However, we rarely get a chance to highlight technology developed to improve campus safety.

Rave Mobile Safety created the product Rave Guardian which offers some unique services and abilities through your cell phone. Basically, Rave Guardian is software that allows users to create and upload profile information. When a student makes an emergency call to campus police, the entire profile is displayed along with their location. That information can also be forwarded to responding officers. This could be extremely helpful in situations when callers are incapable of providing information due to the nature of the emergency or if they are unsure of their location. It seems like this would significantly cut down on time spent on the phone and provide accurate, valuable information to responding officers.

Below is an image of potential information that a user could enter into their profile which can be accessed and modified online. Being involved in the program is voluntary and students decide whether or not to participate. (Click on image to enlarge)

Rave Guardian has two additional features: Panic Call and Timer Mode. Panic Call lets a student send their entire profile to campus police with the touch of a single button. Timer Mode lets students set a timer, that if not disabled, automatically dials campus police. Together, this product offers some impressive features. Instead of simply receiving a phone number and a hurried description, officers would have a color photo, important identifying information and the student’s exact location.

Rave Mobile Safety also offers products to send campus-wide alerts, improve 9-1-1 services, and allow eyewitness information submitted via text message.


Electronic Dating Violence

Gizmodo recently wrote a post about electronics and violence from the results of a survey conducted by the Cyberbullying Research Center.

The Cyberbullying Research Center is interested in better understanding and promoting the concept of “electronic dating violence.” They define it as “emotional or psychological harm in a romantic relationship perpetrated through the use of computers, cell phones, or other electronic devices.” You can find more information between electronic dating and cyberbullying here.

In 2010, this group randomly sampled 4,400 students in the southern United States between the ages 11-18 about electronic dating violence.

Click Read More for the results regarding victimization, offending and the relationship between electronic dating violence and cyberbullying.

Continue reading


Facebook “100 Biggest Sluts” creator could face multiple charges of stalking

An Australian man who created a Facebook page called “100 Biggest Sluts of Ballarat” could potentially face multiple charges of stalking. According to local police, 60 of the 100 women have been contacted by the police and interviews are being conducted. If charges are filed, the creator of the site would face one charge of stalking per victim, up to 100 counts.

The Facebook page listed the names of 100 women and girls from the town of Ballarat and made derogatory comments about them. Some of the girls were as young as 14.

In Australia, it is considered stalking if someone is “using the computer to offend or harass a particular person.” In the United States, online stalking behaviors can often tried as a federal crime because the information travels across state lines. Many states and college conduct policies include references to computers and technology in their stalking and harassment laws and policies. Depending on the nature of the behaviors, it is often tried as a felony.

For more information about stalking, visit the National Stalking Resource Center. They have some great information about state and federal laws, how to record stalking behaviors and a wonderful list of resources. Click on the image to the right for their brochure about stalking. It provides some great information about read flags. Pass this on to anyone you know that works with college students. Over half of stalking cases reported to the police in the United States are from individuals 18-26 years old. This crime is prevalent on college campuses and relevant to college-aged students.

Below is an excerpt from the University of Iowa anti-harassment policy.

  • Harassment” means intentional conduct directed toward an identifiable person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, or persistent that it interferes with work, educational performance, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity on- or off-campus.

Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may be considered evidence of prohibited harassment, if it meets the definition set forth in paragraph a above, includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  1. repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means, after the recipient has made clear that such contact is unwelcome.
  2. physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted as threatening or intimidating. Behavior that constitutes speech is included within this section only to the extent to which it has a direct tendency to incite an immediate violent reaction in a reasonable person or to place a reasonable person in fear of imminent physical harm.
  3. harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking (708.11), the placement of simulated explosives (708.7), ordering merchandise or services with intent to annoy (708.7), or false reports to police (708.7).

To view the entire policy please visit http://www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual/ii/14.htm


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers