Tag Archives: harassment

Creepy “Girls Around Me” app

One of our most popular and engaging workshops through MAC is the one about how technologies are exploited to stalk and harass people. Audiences are often unnerved by how software and hardware is used to gather information that is then used to monitor, locate, harass, impersonate, or intimidate them.

A recent article by John Brownlee at Cult of Mac explores a similarly creepy app called Girls Around Me. At the time of this post, the app had been pulled from the iOS app store, but it doesn’t mean it or something like it won’t come back. The app highlights security and privacy concerns inherent in some of the ways that personal information is disclosed through apps and social networking.

On the surface, the app is sleazy and creepy looking. It is designed with silhouettes of naked women on a radar screen, as if they are targets. It evens advertises that you should consider this public information an invitation to approach these women for sex or worse. “In the mood for love, or just after a one-night stand? Girls Around Me puts you in control.” The app plots public information from profiles on Facebook and Foursquare on a map so that you can see who has checked in near your current location. It also allows you to browse the profiles, check pictures, and message the individual. The design of the app and the stated purpose, again, is creepy unless you are the person “in control.”

However, Brownlee correctly highlights the fact that the app is accessing data that is considered public, whether or not the user understands the privacy settings or how the information is being used.  The best part about the app is it is another example of why we should educate people about how their data is used so that they can make purposeful decisions about what they share. If anything, this is a creepy enough example to get people to pay attention. 

At the end of every technology and stalking workshop, there is a line of people who want assistance in putting a numeric or visual password on their mobile device(s). Hopefully, we can use examples like this to educate people about how their information is distributed and accessed, as well as ways in which they can take steps to remain safe.


January is stalking awareness month

Check out this great stalking awareness campaign called Stalking: Know It. Name It. Stop It. Not only do they have promotional materials to raise awareness about stalking, there are also numerous resources related to safety planning, outreach materials, and information specific to responders like law enforcement and prosecutors.

Last year, the Men’s Anti-Violence Council developed a workshop about commonly exploited technology used to stalk and harass individuals. It has been extremely popular and we have presented it at numerous conferences and workshops. We’ll be presenting it next month at The Big Ten Counseling Center conference regarding how this topic relates to counseling centers and college students. Stay tuned for when we upload the Power Point from that presentation.


Federal judge ruled that “You have a constitutional right to stalk and harass people on Twitter.”

From 2008 to 2010, William Cassidy harassed Alyce Zeoli through Twitter sending her over 8,000 tweets. He criticized her looks, made fun of her religion, described graphic ways in which she could die, and repeatedly told her to commit suicide. Zeoli blocked his accounts but Cassidy just created another one. In 2010, Zeoli reported the harassment and the FBI pressed charges against Cassidy for stalking Zeoli and  causing her “substantial emotional distress.”

However, this week federal judge Roger W. Titus, dismissed the case stating, “while Mr. Cassidy’s speech may have inflicted substantial emotional distress, the government’s indictment here is directed squarely at protected speech: anonymous, uncomfortable Internet speech addressing religious matters.” Apparently Judge Titus doesn’t really understand what  Twitter is. He compared it to a colonial bulletin board where if you didn’t like something, you don’t read it. News flash Judge Titus, Twitter is no different from a text message, email, or phone call. It is direct contact through electronic means with another individual. Just telling someone to “ignore it, turn it off, or don’t look it” is about as good as telling a stalking victim to just block the phone number, quit their job, or simply ignore the animal head left in a box on the front porch. The message this sends to victims is ridiculously callous, “If you don’t like it, too bad, just ignore it.”

However, there was some protection from harassment and stalking enforced this week. A judge in Minnesota ordered a man to take down his “revenge” blog about his ex-girlfriend because individuals have a “right to be free from harassment”and instated a 50 year restraining order! But wait, isn’t a blog is like a colonial bulletin board? No, no it’s not.

Anyone in a position of enforcing or creating rules/laws/policies about harassment, stalking, bullying, or any other inappropriate conduct through electronic/Internet/technological means should have a basic understanding of what the Internet is and how social media services on it function. People should be protected from those who intimidate, threaten, harass, monitor, record, impersonate, and stalk them regardless of the method.


Prison sentence for Facebook and email stalking/harassment

George Bronk just received a four year prison sentence for stalking and harassing women through Facebook and email. George would search Facebook profiles for information to assist him in hijacking email accounts to search for nude or provocative pictures. George would then distribute the pictures to everyone on their contact list and in some cases, blackmail the women to gain additional pictures. When contacted by a victim about why he was doing this, George responded, “Because it’s funny.”

George plead guilty in January to computer intrusion, false impersonation and possession of child pornography. He received four years in state prison for the Facebook and email charges and an additional eight months for the child pornography charges, which requires him to register as a sex offender. 46 women across 17 states came forward in this case as recipients of his illegal behaviors.

This case highlights the importance of taking online precautions but also being aware of security measures. You can create a formidable password, but pay attention to password recovery options. If the information needed to answer generic password recovery questions is available online throughout your social networks, it creates vulnerabilities. A lot of people may know where you went to grade school or your mother’s maiden name. This case also highlights the significance of electronic and Internet-based stalking and harassment. Numerous victims I have worked with dismiss the behaviors because they are afraid no one will take them seriously. “It’s just emails and text messages or comments on Facebook,” is something I hear frequently. 47 states have electronic and Internet-based language in their stalking and harassment laws. It doesn’t matter the means. These behaviors are illegal whether they happen in person or online. Cases like this set a precedent for future prosecution.


New UK initiatives to reduce rape and harassment

Give it up for the UK! They have released some great anti-violence campaigns during the past few years and there is no sign of them letting up anytime soon. Here are two recent examples.

A survey in Scotland revealed that 1 in 5 Scots believed a woman was partially to blame for being raped if she had been drinking. The result was the creation of the following commercial and the Not Ever campaign. The website for the Not Ever campaign has statistics, resources and content that you can download.

The commercial below is from the One Step Too Far campaign in Wales. It is a great example of the cumulative effects of harassment and a counter to the “Lighten up. It’s no big deal” statements.



Facebook “100 Biggest Sluts” creator could face multiple charges of stalking

An Australian man who created a Facebook page called “100 Biggest Sluts of Ballarat” could potentially face multiple charges of stalking. According to local police, 60 of the 100 women have been contacted by the police and interviews are being conducted. If charges are filed, the creator of the site would face one charge of stalking per victim, up to 100 counts.

The Facebook page listed the names of 100 women and girls from the town of Ballarat and made derogatory comments about them. Some of the girls were as young as 14.

In Australia, it is considered stalking if someone is “using the computer to offend or harass a particular person.” In the United States, online stalking behaviors can often tried as a federal crime because the information travels across state lines. Many states and college conduct policies include references to computers and technology in their stalking and harassment laws and policies. Depending on the nature of the behaviors, it is often tried as a felony.

For more information about stalking, visit the National Stalking Resource Center. They have some great information about state and federal laws, how to record stalking behaviors and a wonderful list of resources. Click on the image to the right for their brochure about stalking. It provides some great information about read flags. Pass this on to anyone you know that works with college students. Over half of stalking cases reported to the police in the United States are from individuals 18-26 years old. This crime is prevalent on college campuses and relevant to college-aged students.

Below is an excerpt from the University of Iowa anti-harassment policy.

  • Harassment” means intentional conduct directed toward an identifiable person or persons that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, or persistent that it interferes with work, educational performance, on-campus living, or participation in a University activity on- or off-campus.

Evidence of harassment. Behavior that may be considered evidence of prohibited harassment, if it meets the definition set forth in paragraph a above, includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  1. repeated contact with another in person, by telephone, in writing, or through electronic means, after the recipient has made clear that such contact is unwelcome.
  2. physical, visual, or verbal behavior directed toward another person or an identifiable group of persons that is intended to be or is reasonably likely to be interpreted as threatening or intimidating. Behavior that constitutes speech is included within this section only to the extent to which it has a direct tendency to incite an immediate violent reaction in a reasonable person or to place a reasonable person in fear of imminent physical harm.
  3. harassment proscribed by the Iowa Criminal Code, Chapter 708, including, for example, stalking (708.11), the placement of simulated explosives (708.7), ordering merchandise or services with intent to annoy (708.7), or false reports to police (708.7).

To view the entire policy please visit http://www.uiowa.edu/~our/opmanual/ii/14.htm


What would you do? Bystander intervention opportunities

Have any of you seen the ABC News Primetime episodes called What would you do? The segments create different situations such as racism, violence, homophobia, and harassment. The crew tapes the bystanders’ reactions to the situation and processes the experience with them after the incident. Who knows what they edited out of the situations to obtain the final product, but I think the situations are realistic and helpful in creating discussions about potential bystander interventions. I’ve included two clips below.

The first segment is called Never-Ending, Unwanted Flirtation. It features a male patron relentlessly and aggressively harassing a female customer at the bar despite her protests.

The second clip involves a gay couple at a sports bar. It doesn’t take long for a guy at the bar to start harassing them.

Any thoughts about how the bystanders handled the two situations? Was it realistic? Are there better ways to respond? What do you think?


That’s Not Cool: Sock puppets and textual harassment

Your cell phone, IM, and social networks are all a digital extension of who you are. When someone you’re with pressures you or disrespects you in those places, that’s not cool.

Has anyone seen the videos and resources from That’s Not Cool.com? It’s a fresh new way to create a discussion about issues around digital privacy and inappropriate behaviors. I like how it portrays the situations from a child’s perspective. Want to see sock puppets talking about textual harassment? Wish granted! Here is a video called Text Monster. You get three choices at the end of the clip about how to best handle the situation.

They have some interesting resources. I really like some of  their Callout Cards. These are images that you can send on Facebook, Myspace, download or email to people if they are engaging in behaviors that you find inappropriate. I’ve pasted a couple below. Take a look at their site.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers